Will GTL survive low oil prices?

Small, modular GTL projects near small/remote gas fields could improve feedstock access and offer cost, poly-production, and sourcing advantages, potentially enhancing economic returns.

Share this article

Sasol recently announced that its $11 billion gas to liquids (GTL) and ethane cracker project in Lake Charles, LA has been suspended. Gas to liquids technology takes natural gas and converts it into high-value fuels such as diesel and jet fuel. In addition to fuels, the Sasol plant was also planning to produce petrochemicals. In communicating its decision, Sasol announced that it was delaying final investment decision due to “ongoing capital investment reprioritization.”

Although current commodity prices may have forced Sasol to delay their final investment decision, GTL projects have long been challenged by high capital costs. In comparison to other gas monetization options, such as LNG, GTL projects are very expensive, costing as much as $100,000 in capital costs per barrel per day of capacity. As a result, GTL project returns have lagged those of other gas monetization options as ADI Analytics has shown previously.  Exhibit 1 shows that at current oil and gas prices, i.e. when the oil to natural gas price ratio on a barrel-of-oil-equivalent (BOE) basis is~2.8, a hypothetical GTL project on the U.S. Gulf Coast offer unlevered rates of only 5% or so.

Exhibit 1 shows rates of return for various natural gas projects with a given oil to gas price ratio

Given the high capital costs and long timelines of large-scale GTL projects, technology developers such as Velocys, Compact GTL, and several others have been focusing on small-scale GTL. Although the technology is still under development with a long road to commercial deployment, small scale GTL projects could, in principle, offer the potential of lower capital costs.

In research reported by ADI Analytics elsewhere, small-scale, potentially modular GTL projects could be fixed near small and/or remote natural gas fields, which open up the number of natural gas plays that can be easily tapped for feedstock. Further, small-scale GTL technology could offer advantages over large-scale projects including greater efficiency of capital and operating costs, benefits from poly-production, and better feed sourcing. These factors collectively could improve returns and make small-scale GTL look more economically appealing.

-Tyler Wilson and Uday Turaga

About ADI Analytics

ADI is a prestigious, boutique consulting firm specializing in oil and gas, energy transition, and chemicals since 2009. We bring deep expertise in a broad range of markets where we support Fortune 500, mid-sized and early-stage companies, and investors with consulting services, research reports, and data and analytics, with the goal of delivering actionable outcomes to help our clients achieve tangible results.

We also host the ADI Forum that brings c-suite executives together for meaningful dialogue and strategic insights across the oil & gas, energy transition, and chemicals value chains. Learn more about the ADI Forum.


Subscribe to our newsletter or contact us to learn more.